A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

No. 2 of the seized No. 7, 8, 9 shall be the victim's name unexploited person, 7, 8, 9.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Incheon District Court on December 16, 2008; imprisonment with prison labor for the attempted larceny, etc. at the same court on December 18, 2009; imprisonment with prison labor for six months from the Incheon District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on December 18, 2009; imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the same support on May 4, 2011; imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Incheon District Court on April 18, 2014; and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the relevant prison on June 9, 2015.

1. On August 1, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:00, stolen the victims’ property in the same way five times, as shown in attached Table 1 once again from the date of the crime, in the public parking lot located adjacent to the 280-gu Nowon-gu, Seo-gu, Busan. The victim E, by inserting hand on the driver’s seat window parkeded by the victim E, with one cellular phone of an amount equivalent to KRW 900,000,00 which is the victim’s market value on the ticket, and then inserting it on five occasions, from that time to March 20, 2016.

[In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this Court, the fact that the Defendant stolen property as above is sufficiently recognized.

① Prior to the prosecution, the Defendant recognized the theft of all of the mobile phones and merchandise coupons in attached Table 1 at an investigative agency (hereinafter “the theft of this case”) prior to the prosecution. The statements on the situation of the crime, etc. are very specific and natural.

In particular, according to the statements of police officers in charge at the time, before the defendant made a statement about E's mobile phone among the thiefs in this case, the defendant first made a statement about the date, time, place, and type of damaged vehicle.