A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The structure of telephone financial fraud (one-time “Sing”) is to operate a call center in China, etc. to the effect that it is intended to have the victims transfer money to a designated account by misrepresenting to a financial institution or an investigative agency, to impair loans, or to solve problems to many unspecified people in the Republic of Korea at the call center, by falsely engaging in the operation of the call center in China, etc., each role is shared, such as “general liability” in charge of organic communications among the organizations within the organization, and that it is intended to cause a large number of unspecified people in the Republic of Korea, who are in charge of lending money to a designated account, “coverage” in receipt of the account to be used for the singishing crime from the account holder, “scoverage” in receipt of the account holder’s designated account, “scoverage” in which the victims withdraw the source of damage if remitting money to the designated account, and directly withdraw the source of damage from the receipt book

On November 28, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from a lending company’s staff member (hereinafter “solicitation”) who misrepresented the lending company’s employees to create the transaction details of passbook, and notified the bank account number in the name of the Defendant. The Defendant notified the B bank account number (C) in the name of the Defendant.

On December 2, 2019, an employee of the call center (hereinafter “col center operator”) called a victim D at a non-place on the name of December 2, 2019, and called a false statement that “In order to have a bank and a F bank passbook issued and resolved under the victim’s name, the said bank’s deposit must be remitted to the national security surveillance account. When the case is resolved, the said bank’s deposit should be returned as it is.” On the same day, the victim wired the remittance of KRW 10 million to the said B bank account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

The defendant tried to withdraw the amount of damage from B Bank G on the same day according to the direction of the person who has failed to obtain his name, but withdraws from the employees of the Bank counter.