logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.1.26. 선고 2017노3355 판결
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Cases

2017No3355 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a place of public gathering)

Indecent Acts in this section)

Defendant

A

Appellant

Prosecutor

Prosecutor

Yellow Nacin (prosecution) and in-depth (public trial)

The judgment below

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017 Height4857 Decided September 1, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

January 26, 2018

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The reason for appeal by the prosecutor is too minor to the original sentence, and it is unreasonable to exempt the defendant from the disclosure and notification order of new information.

However, in light of the circumstances described by the lower court on the grounds that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence, the details of the disclosure order and the exemption order, and all other factors of sentencing indicated in the record, it is reasonable to view that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable, and that the Defendant should not disclose or notify personal information.

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Judges

The judge of the presiding judge;

Judges Song Jae-Gyeong

Judges Park Jong-young

arrow