1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of this court's reasoning is as follows: (a) evidence additionally submitted by the court of first instance, which is insufficient to recognize that a doctor B, as alleged by the plaintiff, failed to perform his/her duty to explain in the course of diagnosis and operation with respect to the plaintiff, or did not fulfill his/her duty of medical care normally required; (b) evidence Nos. 8, 9, and witness B, are identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of some of witness B, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.