1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits of this case are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. On May 21, 2015, the Defendant publicly announced an urban management plan [AW District Unit Plan AX-AY Total Area] decision (Modification) and topographic map as follows as a public announcement AZ in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

(2) AX AY AW AW AW BBBD BD AW A (hereinafter “instant specification”) consists of designation of district unit planning, upper and related plans, general status of district planning, planning, direction-setting and basic plans, environmental assessment, and traffic review, etc. In particular, the grounds for prior designation of district unit planning zones are as follows.

AX AY AW, Plaintiff 1 through 7, and 49 own land in the existing district unit planning zone, and Plaintiff 8 through 48 resides or own land in Gangnam-gu Seoul, other than the instant district unit planning zone.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 11, 18, and 21 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Attached entries in the relevant statutes;

(hereinafter referred to as the “National Land Planning and Utilization Act”) . 3. Whether the instant lawsuit is lawful or not

A. A lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity, etc. of a plaintiff's qualification and revocation lawsuit may be brought by a person having legal interest in seeking confirmation of validity or revocation of a disposition, etc. (Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act). Legal interest refers to a case where there are individual, direct, and specific interests protected by the relevant law and regulations, and it does not constitute a case where a person has a factual and economic interest, such as a general, indirect, and abstract interest.

The plaintiffs are the plaintiffs.