logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.11.25 2014고정2162
상해등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 21:09, at the front passage of the house entrance of the victim D (the age of 61) located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment and 101 Dong 803, the Defendant: (b) demanded the victim to open the entrance; (c) the victim was refused to demand the opening of the entrance; (d) the victim was able to walk the entrance, which is the victim’s possession, and caused damage to the front door of the door, thereby impairing its utility by destroying the above entrance of KRW 900,000 at the market price.

2. The injured Defendant continued to inflict injury on the victim by continuously opening the entrance door at the time and place of the preceding paragraph, and entering the victim’s house, leaving the victim’s body by hand, leaving the victim’s body by hand, leaving the victim’s body, leaving the victim’s head, booming the victim’s body by drinking the victim’s hand, taking the victim’s hand by hand, and making the victim’s hand knife and knife the victim’s hand, etc., for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Reporting on hearing statements from victim D phone;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate;

1. Photographs photographs of parts of the body of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the damaged apartment entrance photographs;

1. Relevant Article 36 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the fact that the defendant recognized the mistake and reflects the defendant, the victim and the victim agreed with the defendant smoothly to prepare a written application to the effect that the defendant used the defendant's crime and his wife. It is also decided as per Disposition on the grounds of above Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code (the fact that there is no particular criminal history except for a fine of minor twice prior to the

arrow