logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.18 2016노2523
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (limited to imprisonment for a term of one year, two years of suspended execution, fine of 50 million won, community service work 200 hours) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized that the instant crime was committed as a primary offender with no record of criminal punishment, and is in depth against the Defendant’s depth, and both the Defendant’s family members and sponse the Defendant’s wife.

However, each of the crimes of this case is likely to cause serious harm and injury to society as it infringes on the right choice of consumers on food and undermines the sound distribution order of agricultural and livestock products. In particular, in the case of the crime of violating the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products, the defendant's sale of Chile's freezing swine with the mark of domestic swine with the mark of the mark of the domestic swine for a period exceeding two years, and the period of the crime is very long, and the sale amount exceeds 49,00 km and exceeds 49,00 km, and the sale amount reaches 50,000,000 won.

In addition, the defendant continued to commit a crime even after he was controlled by the Agricultural Product Quality Control Board.

In full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the character and conduct, the environment, the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow