logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.02.14 2013노2475
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. When considering various circumstances against the defendant in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal, the punishment of the court below (2.5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. It is advantageous to the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized so far and there is no history of criminal punishment so far, and that the economic situation of the defendant seems difficult.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant after cooking and selling imported Chinese gimchis and swine girls, etc., with the country of origin marked in the country of origin marked in the place of business. Such act is highly likely to be subject to criticism as impeding the sound distribution order of agricultural and livestock products and undermining consumer confidence, and thus, the amount of imported Chinese gimchis and swine girs sold or kept for sale (100km in Korea, 7.7km in Chile), and the crime was committed for a long period of about six months. In full view of all the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, and the amount of sales sold through the country of origin marked mark, the amount of similar cases, and the amount of punishment for similar cases, etc., the defendant's argument is without merit. Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow