logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.01.23 2013고단2233
공용물건손상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on November 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) moved-type and speed control camera (registration number: 219-81-16973) installed at the traffic control division of the Goyang Police Station in the vicinity of the second freedom (Seoul direction) in the Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the Defendant laid down the USB chip chip (Seoul), which was attached to the above Kamera, and laid down the USB chip in the vicinity of the river.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the repair cost of 11,269,500 won, such as the replacement of a distribution agent and a siren, used by a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Unmanned control materials for suspect vehicles and siren vehicles;

1. A copy of a written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 141 of the selection of punishment (the point of damage to public goods and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) is as follows: (a) intentional damage to the USB chips in which the content of the instant unmanned chips and the content of the control was recorded, which are public goods; and (b) immediately thereafter, the Defendant’s behavior was merely anti-social act that, beyond the economic loss of the public goods, encourages the public morals of legal order and led the police officer, who is the management authority, by posting a telephone to the competent police station, and then notified the fact of the offense, and led the police officer, by giving notice of the fact of the offense. Such behavior of the Defendant is not merely an anti-social act that is extremely unfavorable to the law and order, beyond the economic loss of the public goods, and is extremely poor.

However, the defendant shows his attitude that he seems to be against his will after being able to commit his crime, and the defendant's family is damaged by his family.

arrow