logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고단1355 (1)
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. On November 26, 2016, around 15:06, the Defendant stolen the victim E’s clothes at the “D” store in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by taking advantage of the gap where the victim E, a customer, was neglected due to his neglect of care in the said store, with a 900,000 won of the market value owned by the victim’s 5 mobilephone, cash, KRW 30,000,000 of the market value, KRW 1,000,000,000 of the market value, KRW 1,000,000,000 of the market value, KRW 40,000,000 of the market value, 1,000,000,000,000 won of the market value, and 4,000,000,000 won of the market value.

B. On November 27, 2016, around 16:20 on November 27, 2016, at the 3rd floor of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF building, the Defendant cut off the Defendant with one handbl million won of cash owned by the victim, one cell phone in the market value, one cell phone in the market value, three credit cards (CF, us, Samsung), and one handbl million won of the market value consisting of the non-motor vehicle keys in the market value.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel did not appear at the scene of each of the crimes of this case.

3. Determination

A. First of all, the record reveals that ① in comparison with the photograph of the criminal who was taken on CCTV such as boom at the time of the crime, the appearance is similar to that of the defendant, and the police officer I in charge of the crime of larceny and the husband J of the defendant, who confirmed such photograph, are the defendant.

The facts revealed by the investigative agency, ② each of the instant crimes appears to be the same criminal acts. On November 26, 2016, it is confirmed that the criminal committed on the one hand on November 26, 2016, in the nearest K station to the residence of the defendant after the crime, ③ the criminal records of the manual similar to the instant case are high, and the defendant was punished for larceny at the place of the crime on November 27, 2012.

arrow