Text
[Defendant B, C] Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, this judgment is delivered to the above Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 22, 2011, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, suspension of execution three years, and Defendant C, on June 22, 2011, for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court on June 22, 201, and on June 14, 201, the judgment became final and conclusive on June 14, 201.
Defendant A’s status is the secretary general of metal labor union G chapters, Defendant B’s head of the Democratic Labor union G head office G head office, Defendant C is the head of the education promotion department of metal labor union G head office, Defendant D is the head of the dispute countermeasures department of metal labor union H head office.
Criminal facts
I. “2011 Highest 1094 - Defendant A, B, C, and D”
1. On October 8, 2010, Defendants A, B, and C, and I, J, K, and L knew that an interview was conducted for the recruitment of experienced staff members at the 1st floor conference room located in M M on the first floor, and the interview was conducted on the first floor, and Defendant A had an interview with the victim, P and other persons in charge of the interview with the above company. Defendant A had an interview with the new members. Defendant A had an interview with the victim, including the victim, P, etc. who had an interview with the victim at the place where the interview was conducted, and Defendant A had an interview with the new members. Defendant A had an interview with the victim if she had this opening, she would be infinite if she first and she would be infinite. Defendant 2 had an interview with the victim. Defendant 1 had an interview with the new members: “A she shall have an interview with the new members, she shall have an interview with the new members, she shall have an interview with the new members, she shall have an interview with the first five minutes.”
Accordingly, the defendants jointly with I, J, K, Q and interfered with the interview of the victims' career staff.
2. Defendant D’s work at around 08:00 on October 13, 2010, putting a banner on the front side of the entrance door of R (ju) H, and facing the front side of the access road, then going to work in a way of going to and from work.