logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.06 2017구단31326
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of determining a disability grade against the Plaintiff on May 23, 2017 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 8, 2016, the Plaintiff, who was employed as an employee of the Construction Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., was an occupational accident that caused the said fees to fall down on the wind that sets up the PTB framework in order to set up the first floor slab in the construction site of the company in question, located in the area where the wife population B, was located, on the construction site of the company in question, at the construction site of the PTB mold, and the said fees were set up and unloaded from the construction site of the company, and suffered a closed frame between left and left in the left (hereinafter “instant injury”).

B. On June 9, 2016, the Plaintiff hospitalized a medical corporation with respect to the instant medical branch by receiving artificial crypology in the English Medical Foundation Dental Hospital, etc., and provided outpatient treatment.

C. On May 6, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on May 6, 2017, but on May 23, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition on May 23, 2017 that the Plaintiff’s disability grade falls under class 10 (a person who remains after the nephicalism) (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Judgment of the court below] Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 8 and 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The parties' assertion and the issue of this case 1) The plaintiff's assertion of the parties: According to Article 53 (1) [Attachment 6] of the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act under the "Standards for disability grade" of Article 53 (1) [Attachment 6] of the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, where one part of the three knee knee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee se se se se se se se se s

A. Under paragraph 5 of the disability of a bridge, a person who inserted an artificial aggregate or a body of the human body body into a bridge shall be deemed to be “a person who was unable to properly use the bridge”.

However, the plaintiff received artificial crypology in relation to the trade branches of this case, and the plaintiff's disability grade falls under class 7 of class 8.

Defendant: Plaintiff.

arrow