logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.01 2017고단2608
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On August 8, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months in the original state branch of the Chuncheon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[2017 Highest 2608]

1. The Defendant, in collusion with F on January 30, 2016, visited the Internet “G” website using a computer located in the sub-competence with Non-F on January 30, 2016, and sold the right to freedom of play Park (Baland).

The phrase “I wish to send a right to freedom if you remit 54,00 won to the victim H who reported and contacted the above language.” The phrase “I wish to send a right to use free will.”

However, the defendant and F did not have the above right to use, so even if they received the payment from the injured party, they did not have the intention or ability to send the right to use the right.

The Defendant and F, as seen above, deceiving the victims, and deceiving them from the victims to the I Bank Account (J) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and acquired 54,000 won as the price for free use right, as well as deceiving them over 21 times in total from around that time to February 28, 2016 in the same manner as the attached Table 1 to the victim, and deceiving them, and deceiving them by receiving the total sum of 1,323,50 won from the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with F, deceiving victims and deceiving them from victims.

[2017 Highest 3552]

2. On May 2014, the Defendant: (a) lent money to the Victim K for the purpose of operating money; and (b) will receive a loan or have a full payment for work in the last time.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, the defendant's money operation was not in need of operating expenses, and the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to no particular property or income.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow