logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.03.25 2013고단5887
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bus C.

On October 30, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on October 11, 201:50, and moved ahead of the e-mail or the front road in Gwangju Seo-gu to the Han River for the Korean Medical Hospital at the right place of the Pungam reservoir, while driving the vehicle toward the Han River for the Korean Medical Hospital.

At that time, the signal lights and crosswalks are installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a road by reducing the speed or temporarily stopping it.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected to do so, the Defendant left the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction and moved the Victim F (F) who crossed the crosswalk to the left side of the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals into the front side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, and took the front side of the victim’s bridge with the front wheels.

The Defendant suffered approximately 11 weeks of the above occupational negligence from the victim’s right-hand abandonment abandonment, the opening of which requires treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the F’s statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in the actual condition survey report and diagnosis report;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) by negligence of the defendant, the victim suffered from the victim about 11 week of the 11 week of abandonment of the right-hand pelle, which requires treatment; (b) further, the victim's satisfaction with the right-hand pelle cutting is likely to be expected; (c) however, there are circumstances to consider the defendant's negligence, such as the defendant's failure to interfere with the defendant's camping as construction is being conducted at the three-lane

arrow