1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff is the insurer of D's E-small cargo vehicle (hereinafter the plaintiff vehicle), and the defendant is the driver of F vehicle (hereinafter the defendant vehicle).

D around 19:00 on February 23, 2016, when driving the plaintiff's vehicle and training the plaintiff's vehicle is done in the direction of safeness from the direction of training for each person of the same paragraph.

(Attachment Form No. 3). There is no signal signal, and the Defendant’s vehicle was temporarily stop in excess of the central line in order to enter the alley of the schilled plane from the inner room to the alley of the schilled plane. However, the Plaintiff’s vehicle, as it is in front of the Plaintiff’s moving direction, has shocked the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle into the right side of the Defendant vehicle. Accordingly, while the Defendant’s vehicle was pushed back, the part of the H Kacton vehicle (hereinafter “third vehicle”) of G Driving, which was trying to go to the TW-type intersection from the the alley of the schilled plane, was shocked.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). At the time, the head of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was accompanied by D’s wife I. However, due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as d’s laverization of the right-to-hand laverization, laverization of laver, the right-hand laverization, and laverization of laverization of laver.

I filed a claim for damages against the Plaintiff, who is the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, due to the instant accident, the Suwon District Court rendered a judgment ordering the Plaintiff to pay KRW 125,387,612, and the remainder of KRW 5% per annum from February 23, 2016 to October 16, 2018 and KRW 15% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment. On October 29, 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 142,649,870, the principal and interest of the Plaintiff to I around October 16, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is injury and injury caused by the accident of this case to I.