1. The defendant

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) pay 6,320,000 won;

2...

Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including serial numbers), Eul evidence No. 1, the plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the defendant around August 2016 to August 19, 2017 with the term of lease of KRW 10,000, monthly rent of KRW 250,000 (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"). After delivery of the building of this case from the plaintiff, the term of the lease contract of this case was terminated, while the plaintiff continued to transfer the building of this case to the defendant, the plaintiff occupied the building of this case, occupied the building of this case at the request of the defendant, returned the rent of KRW 2,00,000 to August 10, 207, and returned the unpaid amount of KRW 30,000 to 0,000 as of the date of closing argument, and the remaining amount of the lease contract of this case remains as of 00,000,000.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on August 19, 2017 due to the expiration of the period, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff and pay 6,320,000 won in excess of the overdue rent or rent.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.