A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On October 5, 2007, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by issuing a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sung-nam Branch of Suwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the case of a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on August 11, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 250,000 as a fine for the same crime at least twice.

On August 28, 2014, at around 16:15, the Defendant driven a rocketing car in the state of alcohol alcohol content of about 3 km from 0.170%, in a section of approximately 3 km from 0.170% from 16:15, Sungnam-si to 91, West-dong.

2. On August 28, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) was under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraphs (1) and (3) of this Article, while driving a Cworkstren car, which is one of the four-lanes of the two-lanes of the road front of the Western three-lane, Seo-gu, Seonam-gu, Seonam-gu, Seonam-nam.

In this case, the defendant who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle in a safe manner by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle and maintaining the safety distance with the motor vehicle ahead.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to maintain the safety distance with the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim D to suffer bodily injury, such as catitis, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, and caused the victim F to receive approximately three weeks of treatment.