beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On August 20, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch on August 20, 2007, the summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for the same crime from the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on March 7, 2008, and the summary order of KRW 2 million on April 30, 2010 as a fine for the same crime from the Sungnam Branch Branch of the Suwon District Court on April 30, 201 and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice
On November 6, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at approximately 22:00 and blood alcohol concentration of 0.147%, and the Defendant was under the influence of driving a small-scale car at C, which is one-lane of the shooting distance in front of the Sungnam Financial High School, which is located in the night tower in the area of the branch of Sungnam City.
In such cases, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by complying with the safety distance with the motor vehicle ahead while driving the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, due to the negligence of being negligent in driving, the Defendant, as seen above, led the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 37 years old) who was in the front direction of the Defendant’s driving, followed by the Ei30 vehicle of the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 37 years old), which was in the front direction of the Defendant’s driving, to shock the victim’s car into the front direction of the Defendant’s car, and caused the victim’s car to be pushed down in the future, and led the victim’s Glearning car of the victim F (hereinafter referred to as 33 years old), which was in the traffic signal atmosphere, to shock the part of the driver’s car above i30 prior to the vehicle.
As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence, the victim D suffered injuries, such as catum, fat, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim F, in need of treatment for about one week.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement of D and F;
1. A traffic accident report (1), 2 (2);
1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;
1.Each.