beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 11, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on May 11, 201, with Defendant B, with the content that the construction of the citrus crus crusium (hereinafter “instant crus”), which connects ten greenhouses with the width of 5.5 meters (hereinafter “instant crus”).
B. After completing the construction of the instant water supply facilities, Defendant Don Farming completed the construction of the instant water supply facilities, Defendant Don Farming received the completion inspection on November 29, 201 and delivered it to the Plaintiff.
C. On December 7, 2011, the Defendant Specialized Construction Mutual Aid Association concluded a guarantee agreement with the Plaintiff, and with respect to defects arising out of construction in violation of design drawings and specifications of the instant House built by Defendant Bottleneck, and other instructions, to the guarantee period until November 28, 2014, setting the guarantee period to KRW 528,200, respectively.
On August 27, 2012, the instant Hashes destroyed the Hashes facilities and the opening and closing equipment due to typhoons. As a result, the Plaintiff suffered damages, such as with the death of the planted fruit trees, etc. (hereinafter “instant damages”).
E. The lower court: (a) laid the pole in depth of 50cm above the ground; (b) laid the base of a concrete structure inside and outside the ice with a depth of 1 meter in order to fix the lower ice on the floor; and (c) designed to connect the foundation of the lower gate and the roof structure with the steel line.
[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 8, 10, Eul evidence 5, 6, 7, 8 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and each statement and image;
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff's assertion that he constructed the house in this case is that he was found to have a depth of 20 to 70 m without having a depth of 1m, and he was found to have a depth of 20 to 50cm, and he was not buried in a depth of 50 m. The plaintiff's assertion that he constructed the house in this case. Since the damage in this case occurred due to the above construction defects of the defendant's Dopet farmer, the defendant is the plaintiff's Dopet farmer.