beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay 62,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from January 21, 2015 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 6, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased approximately KRW 70,000 from the Defendant, including Seocho-gu Seoul, for the purchase price of KRW 62 million (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). On the same day, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 5 million and paid the remainder KRW 57,000,000 after paying the down payment to the Defendant.
B. Since then, the Plaintiff was handed over the instant voucher by the Defendant.
C. The instant land extends over the ground of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, C, E, F, G, and H land (hereinafter “instant land”) (hereinafter “the instant land”) (hereinafter “instant land”), E, the owner of the instant land is I, C, G land owner is J, the owner of D land is Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and H land is K (43/323 shares), I (140/323 shares), and J (140/323 shares).
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. On June 2014, the Defendant concluded the instant sales contract with the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff’s primary argument was that the Plaintiff would transfer the ownership of the 16th square meters at the time of maintenance if the Plaintiff purchased the 16th square meters of the 16th anniversary of the Plaintiff’s primary argument: (b) the land at which the Hashes in the instant case was located is maintained in most cities; and (c) the entire part of the toilets was owned by J.
However, around October 2014, I demanded the removal of the instant cargo on its own land and the cargo. The cargo of this case is on the aggregate of six parcels of the instant land as above, and the owner of the cargo of this case is on the land of I, J, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, K, etc., and one half of them are on the land owned by I and J.
Meanwhile, according to the quasi-certification (Evidence A 6) drawn up by the Defendant on September 2, 2007 with I and I around June 24, 2004, and prepared by B and I (Evidence A 7).