logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.07.05 2017고단486
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) informed of the personal information of the fluor in order to prevent danger and injury, and (b) abandoned the fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous fluorous flus

The dubage of the above E was shaking with the dubage as the dubage with the great dubage.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above E who is a public official in the 112 reported dispatch duty and obstructed the execution of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) is as follows: (a) it is not good that a police officer who is performing legitimate duties may commit a crime by using violence.

However, considering favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant reflects his/her wrong, the fact that the defendant appears to be a contingent crime in the state of his/her primary action, and the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account other various sentencing conditions, such as the degree of assault, age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

arrow