The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On June 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on June 22, 2012, the summary of the facts charged, on the ground that at the “Ding Singing Center” set up on the first floor of the Seo-gu Daejeon building C, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the victim E (at the age of 44), an employee of the Defendant, made a statement at the Daejeon Police Station investigation and the Economic 3 Team of the criminal case related to the Defendant.

Within 3 days after the date of birth

A. A person who renders a funeral service;

will not be made available

The term “the victim,” and “the victim was threatened by showing the attitude of doing harm to the body of the victim.” 2. As evidence conforming to the above facts charged, there was each statement in the victim E and witness F’s court and investigative agency, and on the other hand, the defendant, since the investigative agency, to the date and time stated in the facts charged, consistently from the investigation agency to the date and time of the operation of the victim, there was no fact that the victim was singing around the singing room in the operation of the victim, but the victim did not have been able to read

”고 주장하며 공소사실을 부인하고 있다. 살피건대, 피고인과 F, E의 각 관계에 비추어 보면 F, E의 진술이 더 신빙성이 있다고 볼 만한 특별한 사정이 없을 뿐만 아니라, ① E, F는 검찰 조사시에는 “F가 노래방 카운터 옆 주방에서 피고인의 협박하는 말을 들은 후 카운터 쪽으로 나와 피고인과 대면하였고, F가 신고를 하는 것을 보고 피고인이 자리를 떴다”는 취지로 진술하였다가, 이 법정에서는 “F는 주방에 있다가 피고인이 간 이후에야 나와 피고인과 전혀 마주친 적이 없다

“The F made a false statement” and “The Defendant did not refuse to do so with the Defendant, and the F sent a false report.”

“The above two persons’ statements are difficult to easily understand that the same statements have been changed as above, unless they make the statements in line with the statements, and ② the report was made immediately after the case, and E and F are investigated.