The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances agreed with the victim L, M, I, and H appear to be favorable.

However, while the Defendant has been punished several times for the same crime in the past, each of the crimes in this case is committed during the repeated crime period after the Defendant was punished as a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. The nature of the crime is not good. The victim L, M, and I already agreed with the Defendant at the court below that it was the victims who sought the Defendant’s preference at the court below, and that there was no agreement with most victims, and the motive and circumstance of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime, Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and the theory of changes, it is not determined that the sentence imposed by the court below is unfair because it is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.