All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant (unfair sentencing)’s punishment of the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s (unfair sentencing)’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant repeatedly committed each of the instant crimes against multiple victims for a long time, and the amount of damage from occupational embezzlement and embezzlement exceeds KRW 130 million, and the total amount of damage therefrom exceeds KRW 510 million, and even if the amount is not agreed upon, the amount exceeds KRW 250 million, and the Defendant continues to commit the instant crime for the purpose of preparing agreed money even after the first indictment.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant made confessions of all of the instant crimes and reflects against the Defendant; (b) the fact that some victims agreed with the lower court (at the first instance court, it appears that there is no actual amount of punishment paid; and (c) there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than a suspended sentence; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, criminal background, and the circumstances after the commission of the instant crimes, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too weak or unreasonable.

(c)

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.