1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. At around 14:47 on May 18, 2019, the Plaintiff driven the bpoter load from the long-distance distance at the entrance of the west-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, to the C Hospital on the side of the O-wheeled personal street.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear, brake system, etc. without the center line and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Plaintiff neglected to drive the center line with the center line and did not properly conduct the operation of the victim D (the 36 years old), the driver of the victim E-owned FM5 car driving seat prior to the driver's seat of the above cargo vehicle, which requires approximately two-day medical treatment to D, such as light salt clocks, etc. requiring approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim G of the damaged vehicle (the 36 years old), and the victim H (the 7 years old) for light salt clocks, etc. requiring approximately two-day medical treatment, and the victim I (the 5 years old), and at the same time, the victim I (the 1,351,568 won for repairing the damaged vehicle, such as exchange of clocks, etc., and caused damage to the damaged vehicle.

As a result, the plaintiff, while driving a motor vehicle, caused a traffic accident to the victims while driving the motor vehicle, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as destroying property and aiding the victims.

B. The Defendant is the Plaintiff.

On June 27, 2019, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victims of a traffic accident as described in paragraph (1), the Plaintiff rendered a disposition to revoke the driver’s license (class 1 ordinary) (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition on October 1, 2019, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for administrative appeal on November 12, 2019.

On the other hand, however,