The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, and that the defendant is at the location to support his/her mother and his/her married couple.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case was committed by altering the contents of the game product classified by the Game Rating Committee to a game product different from the contents of the game product classified by the Game Rating Committee on the ground that the Defendant was actually engaged in the business of exchanging the outcome obtained through the use of the game product, and the case is not less and less complicated. In light of the seriousness of social harm and harm, such as promoting the speculative spirit of the general public and undermining the desire to work, it is inevitable to severely punish the Defendant in light of the seriousness of such social harm and harm. The Defendant was sentenced to a fine for gambling by operating the speculative adult gambling room even in 2007, and was sentenced to a punishment for the crime of gambling (including KRW 1,00,000), and the Defendant committed the crime of embezzlement at Changwon District Court on October 24, 2008, and each of the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s operation of the game product, which was committed for a short period of time after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and other circumstances of each of this case.

3...