logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.03.13 2012노5559
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant led to each of the crimes of this case under the circumstances in which the Defendant was making a confession of each of the crimes of this case and committed the crimes; (b) the Defendant was liable for considerable debts due to failure of business, etc.; (c) the Defendant’s health status is not good; and (d) the Defendant contributed to the development of the usual community.

2. Considering the facts alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case is limited to the case where the Defendant provided game products without registering the business of providing Internet computer game facilities to the competent authority as a business owner of the game game site, and as well as intended to avoid the legal network on the ground that he was "bathy president", and the nature of the crime is not good. The business period of the game of this case is short of the monthly amount. The Defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case on April 20, 2007, under a suspended sentence of two years on April 20, under the Sound Records, Video Products, and Game Software Act, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on April 207 and under the suspended sentence, and again committed each of the crimes of this case while the Defendant was under the suspended sentence of two years on April 207. The speculative game site is seriously harmful to society, such as the occurrence of family dissolution by leaving the persons who committed the crime at the disadvantage of the game, and its value is high, the Defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances and circumstances before and circumstances before and after this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow