Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 12:50 on April 6, 2012, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s thought to have, without following necessary procedures, he/she had himself/herself, without following the following procedures: (a) on his/her own initiative: (b) modern cards, national cards, etc. in the vicinity of the Geumdong-dong Office in Sungnam-si; and (c) return it to the victim.

2. On February 20, 2012, the Defendant stolen the victim’s D operation “E” store located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, by using the gap where employees’ surveillance was neglected at the “E” Handphone store, the Defendant used one balp balpon in a amount equivalent to KRW 900,000,000 in the market value.

3. On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant stolen the victim’s D operation “E” in the Handphone store located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, with one gallon Handphone at the market value of Samsung juS2 Handphone equivalent to KRW 900,000,000 in the market value.

4. On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with a scar equivalent to KRW 900,000,000 at the market price using the gaps in which employees’ surveillance was neglected in the “H” Handphone store operated by the victim G in Sungnam-si branch; and (b) committed a theft with a ETE mobile phone.

5. On April 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stolen the Victim K, which was in front of the JJ Station 8, JJ Station located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, with a single Samsung Ggalle S2 Handphone at the market price equivalent to KRW 900,000,000,000, using the gaps of monitoring or neglecting of employees at the “L” Handphone store located in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Written statements of D, K and G;

1. Police seizure records, reports on occurrence of crimes, and application of each photographic statute;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 329 and 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.