logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.24 2014나33899
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the additional payment order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 23, 2013, at around 11:35, the Plaintiff, at the right edge of the “Saz sp-sp-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p

B. Defendant C, who was active from the above business chains at a rapid speed and did not control the downflow speed, did not go on one’s shoulder side, and conflict with Defendant B’s side gate, which was unrhying in the direction of the Plaintiff on one’s shoulder side. Defendant B, who was somewhat deprived of balance due to its shock, did not avoid the Plaintiff who was seated on the front bank, and did not go beyond the future, and did so.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The instant accident, which caused the Plaintiff’s negligence, was caused by the Defendants’ negligence. The Plaintiff, from February 23, 2013 to July 27, 2013, the period of hospitalization and outpatient treatment, 100%, from July 28, 2013 to February 22, 2015, lost 23% labor capacity of 23% from July 28, 2013 to February 22, 2015, which is the date of completion of temporary and follow-up disability, resulting in the Plaintiff’s loss of KRW 16,520,39, KRW 686,622 from the medical expenses and medicine expenses for the treatment of injury. As such, the Plaintiff sustained damages to each of the above property losses and the Plaintiff’s mental suffering, 31,207,000 won (=16,520,397,66,686,6200, and damages for delay).

3. Determination

A. According to the fact that the accident of this case occurred 1, the accident of this case was caused by Defendant C’s negligence, electric shock, and left and left by the Defendant C, who was in the speed and direction control direction direction control while getting a skiing and getting a ski.

arrow