Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the Chairperson of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee of the Guang City, and Defendant B is the general secretary of the above Emergency Countermeasure Committee, and the victim D is the auditor of the above apartment committee.

On May 1, 2018, the Defendants conspired to make a conspiracy, which reads that “The liquor tax is required by taking part in the soft movement in front of the C apartment,” and thus, the Defendant’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out the fact that the following facts are publicly attached to the c apartment site, i.e., the public funds at the time when the apartment chairperson is working as the apartment chairperson, and then embezzled public funds, and then the embezzlement was not returned to the present day. When the Defendants failed to be the chairperson due to embezzlement, F, a disqualified person inside the move-in report, as the chairperson, was set up as the auditor, and the embezzled person, as the auditor.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to closure photographs sent and received by the site photographs, complainants and suspects A;

1. Defendants: Articles 307 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning applicable criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (see, e.g., Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da14447, Apr. 2, 2006).