A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2016, the Defendant received 112 report from “D main points” located in the Gu in Ansan-si, and used the Defendant’s home, and assaulted the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s Hah on one time in front of the “D main points” on the front of the “D main points,” around 20:40 on the day on which he continued to use the Defendant’s home at around 20:40 on the same day, on the one hand, the Defendant used the back of G’s horse Hah’s Hah of the same Hah’s Hah of the same Hah’s Hah of the same Hah’s Hah of the same Hahn of the Hah.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statements made to H and G, and the police statements made to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing editing photographs of the end images of the PDA;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Reasons for sentencing of selective sentence of imprisonment [the scope of recommendation in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area of category 1 (Interference with and Forced Performance of Duties) (6 months to one year and four months) and basic area of interfering with the performance of public duties (decision of sentence] - No person subject to special sentencing (decision of sentence] - The circumstances favorable: The defendant's mistake is recognized; unfavorable circumstances: The defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence on July 15, 2016 by the court for interference with the performance of public duties on July 23, 2016 and the above decision became final and conclusive on July 23, 2016. The same crime was repeated during the period of suspended sentence.