logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고단2038
위증
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and by a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 11, 2014, Defendant A appeared as a witness of a occupational breach of trust case against D in the court of Law No. 318 of the Incheon Southern-gu Incheon District Court located in Nam-gu, Incheon, and asked the prosecutor to answer to the question “I have produced the amount of construction in preparation for the estimates. I have prepared the estimates. I have to answer to the question “I have the fact that I had the knowledge of the representative of occupants, that I may have the construction works.”

However, the construction work of this case was actually set B in written estimates that B had suffered losses, and it was said that B had known the representative of occupants to the defendant that B could be accompanied by the construction work.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant B appeared as a witness of the occupational breach of trust case against D at the above date, time, and at a place where he took an oath, and asked the prosecutor to answer to the question of the prosecutor’s “I have known that I would have terminated only introduction to the wife,” and later, the latter answer to the question of whether I would have been responsible for the construction since I would have been able to look at the witness,” and the question of “I have no capacity to carry out the construction from the beginning, if I would have no capacity to do so,” and answer to the question of “I have been determined in E.I.”.

However, although the Corporation entered into a contract under the name of (State) E, it was the first time that the Defendant had decided to work, and the estimate amount was also determined by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.1.

arrow