logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.09.18 2014고단4478
위증
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Incheon District Court on January 6, 2014, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 14th day of the same month, and Defendant B is currently under suspension of execution. Defendant B is still under suspension of execution after appealing KRW 7 million for each fine for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. on May 23, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 16:00 on April 22, 2014, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts to B (i.e., arranging sexual traffic) at the Incheon District Court No. 318, which is located in the Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and asked the prosecutor to answer to the question "I do not have any fact that the witness shows to Defendant B a sexual traffic business establishment "...........", and answer to the question "I do not ask Defendant B of how he had been moving to the commercial sex trafficking business establishment at the time when he had been moving to the commercial sex trafficking business establishment," and answer to the question "I do not have any fact".

However, in fact, the defendant knew that he displayed this sexual traffic business establishment to B and notified B of the fact that he act of similarity with E, etc., B, when investing operating funds, is arranging sexual traffic in this business establishment.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. The defendant B had a trial for the defendant's case, such as violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. by the Incheon District Court 2014 high-level 28 with respect to investing money in the sexual traffic business establishment D, and the defendant B had a favorable judgment at the time of trial.

arrow