Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 00:22 on July 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 at the street in front of the store C in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) and (c) reported 112 that “A man, a man, shall not be able to drive the taxi window and commit violent actions,” and (d) prevented the Defendant by leaving the juncing on the roadway of the Seoul Middle-gu Police Station D police box affiliated with the Seoul Central Police Station, and prevented the Defendant; (b) caused the police officer to face the head on the street, etc.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of 112 reported cases by the police officers, protection of the lives, bodies and property of the people, prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of statement to police officer E;
1. A written statement of slopeF;
1. Investigation report (verification of the degree of damage inflicted by the victim), investigation report (the G telephone call for a witness);
1. 112. List of reported cases;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the police officer's photographs and booms video images;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;
1. Scope of punishment by law: A fine not exceeding 10 million won;
2. Non-application of the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria are not applicable to the determination of fines: 3.0 million won; the offense of this case by the Defendant upon receiving a report of 112 and obstructing the performance of official duties by exercising violence against the police officers dispatched by the Defendant, and the liability for the offense is not less desirable.
Furthermore, as the defendant was pushed down the chest part of the above police officer's chest with his hand, it is difficult to view that the degree of the assault is somewhat weak because the above police officer is faced with the head of the street.
However, the Defendant is against the recognition of the crime of this case.
The defendant is guilty of the instant crime under the influence of alcohol at the time.