Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 23:50 on August 14, 2018 to 23:58, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the damage of property by exposing the advertising board (3m x 4m) located in the subway station, which is the owner of the Seoul Transport Corporation (3m x 4m) in the subway station, before opening the opening of the 1st line Seoul Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul at the unification of Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant destroyed the repair cost of KRW 50,000 by exposing the advertising board (3m x 4m).

2. On August 15, 2018, at around 00:03, the Defendant was removed from C of the Seoul Central Police Station B police box, which received a report of 112 at the place specified in paragraph (1), and received the report, and took a bath that “the Defendant was able to sprinke. sprink. spons. spons. sp. sp. sp. sp. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s.

When floak, floak floak flosh, floshing equally.

D. The snow is considerably dwarf

No. She expressed the bit of bit of bitch far, farch far.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Investigation reports (verification of off-site documentary evidence images) and investigation reports (verification of CCTV images in the Seoul Station of one subway line);

1. On-site seed-raising photographs, CCTV images, and closure photographs;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that there is no particular criminal history on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, and that the defendant admits his/her criminal act and actively sought a letter of suspicion against himself/herself.