The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car at Dbenz B200.

On April 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car at around 20:0, and received the body part of the victim E (54) who was walking on the side of the road due to occupational negligence, which did not well see the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and interest of the said car from the front

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim about 6 weeks and about 12 weeks of medical treatment, such as extreme fluences, fluences, fluences, and fluences, and fluences, fluences, and fluences of traumaed props.

2. The facts charged of the instant case constitute a crime for which a victim cannot institute a prosecution against the victim’s explicit intent (Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents). Since it is recognized that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the Defendant by mutual consent with the victim after the indictment of the instant case, the indictment of the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.