logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.01.11 2017나13302
해고무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for changing or adding corresponding parts as set forth in paragraph (2) below.

2. Parts to be altered or added;

A. The replacement part 1) 5 pages 5 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance changed "A evidence 4, Eul evidence 1, 5, 8, 9" into "A evidence 4, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 1, 5, 8, and 10, each statement and images of the evidence 1, 3, 4, 7 evidence 1, 5, and 8 through 10, and the testimony of H of the judge of the court of first instance". 2) Up to 6 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, "The testimony of Eul 1, 3, 4, 7 evidence 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 evidence 1, and evidence 1, E, D, and G testimony" as "each testimony of the witness of the court of first instance, E, D, G, and party witness".

B. 1) The part added 1) the 6th 1st son of the judgment of the first instance. “In particular, H [the representative of I, who is conducting the inspection entrusted by the C City Waterworks Business Headquarters with the Defendant] heard the fact that a civil petition was filed in relation to the Plaintiff on September 6, 2016, and received the report from the C Si Waterworks Business Headquarters on the same day, and read the main substance of the civil petition written in the said report to the Plaintiff at the office on the same day. In addition, H sent to the Plaintiff a photograph of the “the part in which the main facts (four types) of sexual harassment and sexual indecent act were indicated in the said report on September 19, 2016.” In addition, prior to the holding of the instant disciplinary committee, the Plaintiff appears to have already been aware of the main contents of the civil petition’s employees.” 2) The Plaintiff’s employee added 6th 1st son of the first instance judgment to the Plaintiff’s “1st son.”

3) Following the 7 lines from the 6th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the 19th sentence is added as follows. â…………………. The plaintiff is the defendant.

arrow