logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 07. 11. 선고 2019두38199 판결
(심리불속행) 법인에 유보된 이익을 분여하기 위하여 대외적으로 보수의 형식을 취한 것으로 손금불산입 대상이 되는 상여금과 실질이 동일함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu65837 (20 March 20, 2019)

Title

(In order to distribute profits reserved to a corporation, the form of remuneration has been taken externally, and the bonus subject to non-deductible expenses and the substance are the same.

Summary

(Main) If the pertinent remuneration is merely an external arrangement of the form of remuneration in order to allocate the profit reserved to the corporation mainly rather than a normal price for the performance of duties by an executive officer, the said remuneration is identical to the bonus subject to non-deductible expenses as a disposition of profit, and thus, cannot be included in deductible expenses.

Related statutes

Article 43 (Non-Inclusion of Bonuses in Deductible Expenses)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow