logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.09.28 2017고단370
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On June 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on June 16, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 16, 2017

[2] The defendant's crime committed without registration is a person who introduces an employee (AC) in the E tea room, etc. located in D in the smuggling run by the victim C (36 years).

1. The Defendant, as above, has engaged in occupational embezzlement, and has been engaged in the business of managing monetary problems between the employees and the business places that caused the introduction.

The Defendant introduced, around July 19, 2015, to the above E.I.D.

F From the employee of F, “E has retired from work,” and 9 million won has been transferred to C to the Gwangju Bank Account (G) in the name of the Defendant, and was stored for the victim. At that time, he voluntarily consumed the money from the unclaimed land to the repayment of personal debt.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. On July 17, 2015, the fraud Defendant: (a) in the instant EDaca operated by the victim on July 17, 2015, the victim: (b) took employment of the victim with a payment of KRW 7 million in advance at a hump scar; and (c) he/she returned the money that he/she received at the face of the escape.

In addition, it will also be introduced to offer 4 million won a bill to a single bill.

“.......”

However, in fact, the defendant did not seek weather or spawn to work in the above multilateral bank in advance, and was thought to arbitrarily consume the received vessel's spawn, so the defendant introduced and did not have any intent and ability to return the vessel's spawn even if she escaped.

Defendant: (a) the amount of KRW 3 million on July 17, 2015 and KRW 2 million on the part of the victim, by deceiving the victim as above, to the account in his own name from the victim;

7. A total of KRW 11 million was remitted on three occasions, including KRW 6 million.

arrow