The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (the penalty amounting to 500,000 won and the penalty amounting to 4 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a net manner and committed the instant crime in depth.

In addition, while the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case at a relatively old age, he is currently responsible for supporting his family as the most old family, such as finding a de facto marital relationship and raising his father and wife around January 2015.

B. The crime of this case committed around September 2009 by A, which became final and conclusive on October 7, 201, and the remaining crimes of this case shall be considered in relation to the crime of this case with special larceny, etc. for which the judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2014 and the latter concurrent crimes under Article 37 of each Criminal Act, with respect to which the latter concurrent crimes of Article 37 of each Criminal Act, should be considered together in relation to the crime of this case.

However, the instant crime committed by the Defendant, by means of the so-called “insurance fraud” method such as intentionally inducing a traffic accident and pretending to be a traffic accident caused by negligence, by deceiving about four times the amount equivalent to approximately seven million won, such as a disguised act of causing a traffic accident, and the punishment of the unlawful act is not somewhat weak.

In addition, it seems that the defendant did not take any particular measures to recover the damage of the victim until now.

In addition, the favorable circumstances mentioned above have already been fully reflected in the judgment of the court below.

In full view of the fact that the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable, taking account of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s ground of appeal cannot be accepted.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.