(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.12.11 2015노646 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.12.11 2015노646

강제추행

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (4 million won of fine, 40 hours of order to complete a program) by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a net manner and committed the instant crime in depth.

The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a contingent manner while drinking a little number of alcohol at a meeting with the believers by commemorateing one’s own life on the day of the instant case.

In addition, the Defendant driving a truck from new walls to late at night, supplied goods to the company’s customer and maintained his livelihood. The Defendant is in a position to support the parents, deny, son, and 2 early old (84 years old and 80 years old), and the Defendant does not have the same criminal record until now is considered favorable to the Defendant in the course of the determination of the punishment for the instant crime.

However, the crime of this case is an indecent act committed by the victim who had danced at his age club by the method of taking three times the part of the victim's her her m or her m or m with his m or her m orm with his m orm with his her m orm with his m orm with his m orm

In addition, the Defendant did not take any particular measures to recover the damage of the victim, and until now, did not receive any tolerance from the victim.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the fact that the Defendant had a past record of criminal punishment up to 24 times, and the favorable circumstances as seen earlier seems to have been sufficiently reflected in the judgment of the lower court’s sentencing, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s ground of appeal cannot be accepted.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2015.11.06 2015노539

-청주지방법원 2015.10.16 2015노755

-청주지방법원 2015.11.13 2015노599

-청주지방법원 2015.11.20 2015노515

-청주지방법원 2015.12.04 2015노661