beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 2,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants, along with C and D, established a floating corporation, opened a mobile phone in the name of a corporation by a communications company (SKT, KT, or LGU), and conspired to dispose of the mobile phone terminal and core chips to other persons and to engl them.
C has recruited a person who borrowed the name of the juristic person to form a corporation by preparing and arranging documents necessary for the establishment of the juristic person, and delivered the seal impression and certificate in the name of the juristic person to the public, thereby going through each agency across the country, and disposed of it, and D has a role to open the mobile phone in the name of the juristic person, and D has a role to open the mobile phone in the name of the juristic person along with the mobile phone opening books that he has recruited, managed, and opened the mobile phone in the name of the juristic person, along with the mobile phone opening books that he has received from C to the agency of the State, and the defendant A, B, and the defendant E, F, and G have a role to open the cell phone in the name of the juristic person, and to establish the juristic person after receiving documents necessary for the establishment of the juristic person from D, or to open the cell phone in the name of the juristic person, and 30,000 won for the mobile phone opened in the other area and 50,000 won for the mobile phone opened to the juristic person.
1. On March 28, 2013, Defendant A, in collusion with C, D, etc., to share the above role, and at the “I agency” of the Victim SK Telecom with H in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the name of the juristic person, Defendant A had no intent or ability to pay the cost of the device normally even if he opened a mobile phone in the name of the juristic person, and Defendant A, in spite of the absence of intent or ability to pay the cost of the device normally, by deceiving the victim SK Telecom as if he would normally pay the cost to the victim’s SK Telecom, and received one mobile phone of the amount equivalent to KRW 849,200 at the market price from an employee under the name of the Defendant, who was in default, to receive the cost of the device in the name of the Defendant,