The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the defendant did not provide F or other juveniles with the lawsuit, and F or others drinking the lawsuit during the period when the defendant works in the main room.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① the police police and the court below stated consistently that the defendant was suffering from the Soviet 2 disease after asking him whether he was Jant students; ② the F did not have any interest in the defendant; ③ the police did not seem to have a high possibility of making a false statement in the absence of any interest in the defendant; ③ the police officer dispatched after receiving a report of the child's drinking; ③ the police officer's photograph (as the investigation record No. 49,50 pages) taken by him at the time of crackdown, it appears that the F et al. did not have sufficient evidence to find that there was about 2/3 or more alcohol on the bar table, and the F et al. were not aware of the fact that it was difficult to find that there was no legitimate evidence to believe that there was a little difference between the defendant and the defendant's 2/3 or more alcohol.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.