The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. The defendant of mistake of facts did not sell alcoholic beverages to the juvenile daily behaviors who had been a customer, and the above juveniles arbitrarily taken the tenant who had been in the restaurant cooling house while the defendant was living in, and the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged was erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A. The Defendant alleged the same purport as the grounds for appeal in this part of the judgment below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts.

The court below rejected the defendant's above assertion on the grounds that the defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant sold three soldiers who are alcoholic beverages to a juvenile, such as D, as stated in the facts charged, on the grounds that the defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that he sold the three soldiers who

In light of the following circumstances, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law that misleads the facts as alleged by the defendant, in light of the circumstances described by the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

① Witness D, E, and F, who are juveniles, testified in the original trial and the trial court that “I am together with a week 2 disease while I am in the above restaurant, and thereafter, I am added a week 1 disease, and the Defendant asked her “I am not a dead minor” to “I am,” but the Defendant did not demand a separate identification card.”

② In the telephone conversation with investigative agencies, the instant reporter made a report on the following grounds: “At the time of the instant restaurant, juveniles who seem to have been living alone are able to be aware that they would have been under the influence of alcohol even though they were able to have been under the influence of alcohol.”

B. The assertion of unfair sentencing.