Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 1, 2012, the Defendant sentenced 10 months to imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on June 1, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Prison on October 8, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On November 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 03:30, the main point of the “E” of the “E” for the victim of the 1st underground floor of Daejeon Daejeon Daejeon District Court (Seoul District Court Decision 2006Da31448, Nov. 19, 2012), the Defendant issued an order to the victim, as if he would have paid the price, to the victim, and then acquired it by deception, such as 11 disease and algoriju equivalent to the total market value of KRW 70,00,000.
2. On November 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20, at the “H” main point of the Victim G management in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant: (b) issued an order to provide the victim with alcohol and alcohol as if he would have paid the price to the victim; (c) but (d) obtained the victim’s order to pay the price to the victim; and (d) obtained the victim’s order to pay the price to the victim; and (e) obtained the victim’s order to provide the 180,000 won in total from the
3. On November 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 09:40, the fact at the “K” restaurant operated by the Victim J in the Dae-dong War-gu I was obtained from the victim for three persons, 21,000 won of the market price, i.e., three persons, 1,000 won of the market price, 21,00 won of the market price, and 4 soldiers, etc., who were subject to the order of food and alcohol from the victim, even though they did not have the intent or ability to pay the price despite having ordered food and alcohol
"2013 Highest 1298"
1. On December 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 03:10, 2012, at the “Nju store operated by the Victim M in Ma,” the Defendant issued an order to pay the amount to the victim even if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount to the victim even if he/she received an order to pay the amount to the victim; and (b) the Defendant received an order to pay the amount to the victim as if he/she would pay the amount to the victim; and (c) the Defendant received an order to pay the amount to the victim; and (d) the Defendant received from