beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Attachment] On September 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court (Seoul District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Branch on April 7, 2013.
[2014 Highest 482]
1. On March 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the car page operated by the victim C at the time of strike around 01:50 on March 1, 2014; and (b) on the fact, the Defendant orders the victim to pay the price in the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price; and (c) on the part of the victim, the Defendant was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 135,000 at the market price.
[2014 Highest 536]
2. On March 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on the car page operated by the victim E in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; and (b) on the fact, the Defendant orders the victim to pay the price as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she orders liquor, etc. to the victim; and (c) ordered the victim to pay the price as if he/she had the intention or ability to pay the price; and (d) was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 34,00 in total at the market price from the victim.
[2014 Highest 576]
3. At around 05:00 on February 27, 2014, the Defendant received the victim G’s “H” main points operated by the victim G in Pakistan, and the Defendant, as if he were to pay the price even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she received the victim’s alcohol, etc., he/she acquired the said amount by being provided with the sum of KRW 289,000,000, including the two-years 17,000, as he/she did not pay the price.
[2014 Highest 587]
4. On March 6, 2014, at around 20:00, the Defendant: (a) was operated by the Victim J in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) the Defendant, even if ordering the victim to alcoholic beverages, was engaged in the act as if the Defendant would have paid the price despite the victim’s intention or ability to pay the price; and (c) ordered each of the instant 1 bottles, Man-ju, Man-ju, Man-ju, Man-ju, Man-ju, Man-ju, Man-ju, 1 allotment of tobacco, etc.; and (d) was provided by the
[2014 Highest 997]
5. The Defendant around 00:15 on March 28, 2014.