The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On August 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a bicycle around 00:30 on a charge; (b) proceeded with a bicycle riding route of 14-lane Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul to a military guard; and (c) went to the left.

In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to care for the driver of the vehicle to properly see the opposite road condition and safely drive the vehicle, and to prevent the accident by failing to do so, the defendant neglected to turn to the left, and due to the negligence of entering the opposite road, the victim C(38 tax) who was on the opposite side of the victim C(38 tax) who was driving on the opposite side of the bicycle, the front side of the bicycle side of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cage cage cages, which require approximately four weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the damaged vehicle’s repair cost of KRW 2,240,380.

2. Article 327 subparag. 6 of the applicable Criminal Procedure Act; the main sentence of Article 3(2) and Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (the expression of non-existence of punishment on September 7, 2016, which is the date of institution of public prosecution);