The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as a member of the “E”, which is a group of taxi engineers who have monopolyed the long distance in D located in F, G, H, I, etc., in collusion with F, H, I, on May 2, 2010, when the victim K, who is a J taxi driver, stops in front of and after the victim’s taxi, using the vehicle of the defendant, etc., in order to conduct his/her business, when the victim K, who is a J taxi driver, stops on May 2, 2010, and prevents the victim from driving the taxi, thereby preventing the victim from driving the taxi. The victim resisted this, G, F, and I expressed the victim’s desire to “I shall do so like bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and I expressed the victim’s desire to “I,” “I will interfere with the victim’s desire or interfere with his/her business.”

2. According to the records, the defendant was indicted on the ground that he interfered with business affairs stated in the facts charged, such as blocking the taxi operation of the victim by using the “L” taxi. However, according to the witness F’s legal statement, the defendant’s certificate of employment, and the dispatch log, the defendant was not driven a “L” taxi on May 2, 2010, and there is no other evidence to prove the facts that the defendant had not driven a “L” taxi on May 2, 2010, and was not located at the above place.

3. In conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, the above facts charged is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325