The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the defendant discovered the body card in the name of the victim who was laid down from the subway No. 4 Station of the subway No. 4, and only used the above body card in the front trial, and there was no theft of the victim's bags on the front line of the subway No. 4, as decided by the court below (hereinafter "the provisional bank of this case").

2. The court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., on March 26, 2013, when the victim was boarding the subway No. 4 to return home at the subway No. 17:30 on March 26, 2013. The victim was aware that the bank of this case was destroyed because he was set back on the stroke or half of the subway No. 4, and the defendant attempted to use the body card in the name of the victim on March 26, 2013 at the home No. 19:5 Home No. 19:5 Home No. 19:5 Home No. 201, Mar. 26, 2013. The defendant stated in the police that "the defendant was carrying the bank of this case from the wire No. 4 and brought to the basin No. 17:30 on March 26, 2013.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the judgment of the court below is clearly stated that each “compact” of the two pages 2, 19, and 3 is a clerical error in each “compact”. Thus, each of the above parts is in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.