Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants in collusion with the Defendants on October 6, 2015, and the facts in Songpa-gu Seoul E building on October 6, 2015 are the victim F.

9. On October 2015, 2015, after entering into a "G Contribution Convention (MU)" in coordination with our bank around 24, it was decided to deliberate and resolve on the implementation issue of the agreement through a special meeting of the firstman on October 2015, and it did not receive a resolution from the management group and did not appropriate management expenses at the general merchants' association.

As the title "the Chairperson of the management unit without a decision on the management unit management, caused problems related to the use of management expenses and profit-making funds, and thereby, damaged the reputation of the said victim by openly pointing out false facts by preparing a printed matter with the content that "the representative meeting of the management unit is being carried out in the form of ratification of the resolution on the use of management expenses ( October 6) on the gold day, and distributing it to the commercial merchants."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by each of the defendants in court;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a complaint (including business agreements and inducements);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 307 (2) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order asserts that the Defendants’ act is dismissed in accordance with Article 310 of the Criminal Act, since the contents of the printed materials prepared and distributed by the Defendants are true, and the distribution of printed materials aims at the public interest of securing objectivity and transparency in the enforcement of funds for the management of E commercial buildings.

The following facts and circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, are conflicted between the Defendants and the victims who are the president of the E commercial building management unit as a voluntary organization and the above commercial building operation.